Triage questionable media
Review media for manipulation signals
Triage questionable images, video, or posts: what's observable, what's uncertain, and what's worth verifying — with no overstated verdicts.
Illustrative content · Public sources only
| Observation | Type | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent lighting | Visual | Low |
| Metadata mismatch | Technical | Medium |
| Recycled older media | Context | Medium |
A decision-ready artifact
What you get
A focused brief that keeps the evidence, uncertainty, and next actions visible.
- Timestamped observations
- Possible explanations
- Confidence per observation
- Context gaps
- Recommended verification steps
Start with what you know
What you can enter
From input to source-linked brief
- 01Submit media
Provide the item and where it came from.
- 02Observation
Note observable signals and uncertainties.
- 03Context check
Look for prior appearances and context gaps.
- 04Review
Get observations and verification steps — not a verdict.
Use cases
Decide what to verify before reporting.
Triage flagged media for a human reviewer.
Document observable signals transparently.
Assess questionable media about a brand.
What this is not
Actual Armor works with public-source signals and source-linked analysis to support human review — not to replace legal, compliance, or investigative judgment.
- Observable signals and gaps only
- No authenticity verdict or deepfake determination
- No attribution of intent
- Public / supplied sources only
Frequently asked questions
Does it detect deepfakes?
No. It surfaces observable signals and uncertainties and recommends verification — it does not issue an authenticity verdict.
Will it tell me who made it?
No. It does not attribute origin or intent.
What do I get?
Timestamped observations, possible explanations, gaps, and verification steps.
Start with a source-linked brief
100 free credits included. Begin now and get a structured, reviewable artifact back.
Review media